KFC’s Fried-Rat Claim
The Photograph and the Test
Forgotten History · 2015
Archived on
Region
United States
Associated With
KFC - restaurant chain
Defining Feature
A tail-like strip of breading on a disputed chicken tender
Status
Historical event - KFC reported that testing identified the item as chicken
Overview
A photograph posted in June 2015 prompted a disputed claim that KFC had served a customer a fried rat.
Devorise Dixon posted images of a breaded item he said came from his meal. KFC disputed his account. On 22 June, the company said an item supplied through his attorney had been tested and identified as chicken.
A 24 June Southern Courier report reproduced a KFC-released statement naming Food Safety Net Services and a poultry-species ELISA assay. That statement described the sample as poultry. The reviewed coverage does not include the laboratory report itself.
Why It Mattered
The photograph made the allegation easy to share, but appearance alone could not establish what the item was. KFC’s response introduced a different kind of evidence: a reported examination of a submitted sample. The surviving coverage illustrates why attribution matters when a food scare spreads through images: a company’s account of testing and a directly inspected laboratory report offer different levels of verification.
The Viral Allegation
- Eater preserves a Facebook post attributed to Devorise Dixon and dated 12 June 2015.
- Dixon said one piece in a three-piece tender order near Wilmington Avenue and 120th Street was a cooked rat.
- The Los Angeles Times described the memorable shape as a breaded piece attached to a longer strip that could be read as a tail.
KFC’s Reported Test Result
- On 22 June, KFC said Dixon’s attorney had turned over the item the previous Friday and that testing identified it as chicken rather than rat.
- A reproduced KFC statement named Food Safety Net Services, Ltd. and an ELISA-TEK Cooked Poultry Species Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay Kit.
- Although some coverage called it a “DNA test”, a reproduced KFC statement specified a poultry-species ELISA assay.
The Disputed Purchase Site
- Dixon placed the alleged purchase near Wilmington Avenue and 120th Street; KFC now lists a restaurant at 11864 Wilmington Ave.
- The restaurant owner reportedly said security footage did not show Dixon as a customer, though the footage was not reviewed in the available reporting.
- No Los Angeles County public-health finding, closure order or complaint determination for the allegation appears in the supplied record.
Sources & Records
Southern Courier reproduced a KFC-released statement naming Food Safety Net Services and a poultry-species ELISA assay on 24 June 2015. The quoted conclusion identifies poultry.
What KFC's DNA Test Revealed About Customer's Claim That Chicken Tender Was Fried Rat
ABC News reported KFC’s statement on 22 June 2015 that an item supplied through the customer’s attorney had tested as chicken. The test result is attributed to the company.
CNN Erin Burnett OutFront — Jeanne Moos Report, 16 June 2015
A contemporary broadcast transcript quotes Dixon’s account of freezing the item and returning with photographs and a receipt, alongside KFC’s request to examine it. These are attributed accounts before the reported test.
Los Angeles Times — Is It a Fried Rat? The Initial Claim and KFC’s Response
The 17 June report describes the tail-like breading, Dixon’s claimed purchase location and KFC’s opposing photographs and statement. It records the disputed accounts rather than independently identifying the item.
Eater — Man Claims KFC Served Him a Deep-Fried Rat
This 17 June report reproduces a Facebook post attributed to Dixon and documents how his allegation circulated online. The preserved post supports what was claimed publicly, not whether the photographed item was a rat.
Los Angeles Times — Mystery of the Rat-Shaped KFC Chicken Is Solved
The 22 June follow-up reports KFC’s announced test result and the attorney’s handover. It also records the restaurant owner’s claim about security footage; the footage and original laboratory report are not provided.
Gallery
Credit
Devorise Dixon
Licence
Historical Ephemera
Displayed for commentary, criticism, research and historical documentation where permitted by applicable law. No permission for reuse is granted.
Caption
Dixon’s photograph of the unusually shaped breaded item sparked the 2015 allegation, which KFC disputed.
Credit
ABC News / KFC
Licence
Historical Ephemera
Displayed for commentary, criticism, research and historical documentation where permitted by applicable law. No permission for reuse is granted.
Caption
KFC’s comparison image showed the breaded item opened up, presenting the company’s response to Dixon’s allegation.